Through
reading Richard Rive’s No Room at
Solitaire, it is pretty clear
the story can be considered a political story just by reading the
circumstances as to why Fanie van der Merwe is having a difficult business day
on Christmas Eve. For the beginning of the story, Richard Rive provides background
information as to why Fanie van der Merwe and Oom Sarel are having issues
between themselves and the financial consequences for Fanie. When Fanie argued
that a black can be educated beyond the standard six through using Witbooi’s cousin educational success as an
counterargument for Oom’s belief it is not possible, Oom responded in anger by
proclaiming, “he would not drink in a bar owned by a man who had sold his people
to the communists” (Rive 39). This proclamation was not the only act of
retaliation; Oom held a braaivleis with free boerewors and brandy on Christmas
Eve. Add on to the fact that Oom is a wealthy and powerful man in their
district, Fanie fears his influence will spread the word of his “communist”
beliefs and possibly extend the financial misfortune. The situation that Fanie
is going through is very similar to what many in the United States had gone
through in the McCarthy Era. Many people in that era were accused of communism
through little evidence and face severe consequences through imprisonment and
financial punishments. For Fanie, this is a replication of what occurred during
the McCarthy Era through Oom isolating Fanie’s business. This view of
retaliation because of an accusation of communism can make this story a
political story.
No comments:
Post a Comment